Case study atlas
Review Climate & environment Governance & MERL

A formative review of Pacific climate finance capacity

Pacific region New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) 2026
Map showing Pacific region at 15.00°S · 179.00°E

MFAT's formative review of the Climate Finance Capacity Support Programme — a NZ$30 million programme helping 15 Pacific countries access and use climate finance.

The challenge

Climate finance is central to the Pacific's response to climate change, but accessing it and using it well is often harder than securing it. The Climate Finance Capacity Support Programme (CFCSP) — a NZ$30 million programme funded through New Zealand's International Climate Finance programme and delivered by DT Global from January 2024 to December 2026 — helps 15 Pacific Island countries plan, access, deliver and report on climate finance. With the programme in its first phase, MFAT commissioned a formative review to test how well it was working and to shape any future support.

What we did

  • Carried out MFAT's formative review of CFCSP in the first half of 2026, assessing relevance, effectiveness and how the programme is delivered.
  • Visited the Cook Islands, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Fiji to hear directly from the countries and advisers the programme supports.
  • Tested how CFCSP's main tools — embedded advisers, short-term technical support, mentoring and training — are working in practice.
  • Set out recommendations for any future phase, grounded in how the programme has worked best.

How we worked

Dr Fiona Kotvojs, Ben Schultz and Kirsty Burnett carried out the review together, combining climate-finance, evaluation and MERL expertise. We spoke with partner governments, embedded advisers and MFAT, and worked from the programme's own reporting, to build a grounded picture of where the programme adds the most value.

Outcomes

Performing well in its early phase We found CFCSP performing well in its early phase and closely aligned with what Pacific countries need.
The barriers are institutional, not just technical The review recognised that many barriers to climate action are institutional rather than technical — staff shortages, coordination and public financial management systems — and that embedded advisers have been particularly effective where capacity is tightest.
A flexible, demand-driven next phase For any future phase, we recommended a flexible, demand-driven facility, building on how the programme has worked best in practice.

Let's talk

Tell us what you're trying to achieve.

We work alongside you — not on your behalf. Wherever you are in the project cycle, there's a sensible first conversation to be had.